Friday 30 May 2014

Maria's Story

"Marital breakdown leading to reduced household income. Stopping of carer money for daughter reduced income due to rejected claim. Both daughters in full time education. Tax credits/ carer / child benefits stopped when daughter reached 20 even though she is still in full time education. Job seekers money and child maintenance funding debts and bills, but no money left for food. I am due to start a new job on Monday but it will be 3 weeks until I receive a wage."

Our thanks to Maria for sharing this with us. We know the past year has been incredibly difficult and we wish you all the best in your new job.

Tuesday 27 May 2014

Sandra's Story


"Circumstances are that I do not have any money to buy food. I am experiencing mental health difficulties. I have no local family and friends or support network. Someone took advantage of using my bank card and took money from my account, leaving me with no money. I feel quite vulnerable at the moment and have had strangers come to my home, knocking my door and asking for things. Through the support of Foodbank today, housing have been contacted and arrangements made for a safety catch (chain) to be fitted on my door. This will make me feel safer which is paramount to my heart".


Our heartfelt thanks to Sandra for sharing her story with us.

Wednesday 21 May 2014

Faith in Foodbanks? Exciting NEW Church Resource!



In the last five years the need for foodbanks in the UK has grown dramatically. Thousands of Churches have responded by starting or supporting foodbanks within their communities. Last year Trussell Trust, which helps 4 in 10 of the UK's foodbanks, fed over 900,000 people including more than 300,000 children. The entire foodbank movement will now feed well over a million people a year.

The Revd Dr Michael Jagessar, Moderator of the General Assembly of the URC said: "The truth is the church should not have to have faith in foodbanks - but they are a sign of the times -a sign that the world is not as the God of justice intends it to be, a sign that the church will respond to poverty by taking practical measures to help those who are most in need, but also a sign that we need to ask deeper questions about the causes of poverty and inequality in our country."

"The rising cost of essentials such as food, fuel and housing coinciding with static low incomes, people not being able to find enough work and continued austerity measures, has left many families with no alternative but to turn to foodbanks for help."

13 million people live in poverty in the UK today. This includes 3.5 million children - a number that is set to rise to 4.6 million by the end of the decade. Families that need foodbanks represent the sharp end of poverty and the best evidence says they are driven there by benefit delays or changes along with low income and high living costs.

The Revd Ruth Gee, President of the Methodist Conference, added: "Why are new foodbanks opening across the country every few days when this is one of the wealthiest nations in the world? When we hear stories about the increasing need for foodbanks, we are bound to respond and to obey Jesus' command to love our neighbour - supporting foodbanks is one way of doing this. We also need to recognise that the need will continue to increase unless we tackle the underlying causes of food poverty."

"We need to be asking why this is happening." added the Revd Dr Chris Ellis, President of the Baptist Union of Great Britain, "The stories and reflections in the 'Faith in Foodbanks?' resources challenge us to question the injustices of systems of power that allow individuals and families to go without food. The Bible calls us to put our faith into action. Churches involved with foodbanks and asking the deeper questions about food poverty are doing just that."

"Faith in Foodbanks?" is a three-part resource including an outline of the facts and fiction surrounding foodbanks, along with worship materials, reflections, prayers and action points and six Bible studies that explore the ministry of foodbanks and what God's Word might teach us about them. The resource is now available to download

The Baptist Union of Great Britain, the Methodist Church, the United Reformed Church and Church Action on Poverty have produced a three-part resource for churches about the growing food poverty crisis.

"Faith in Foodbanks?" recognises the ministry of many churches helping people who cannot afford to eat, looks at why there has been such a growth in foodbanks, and suggests ways churches can take action to tackle the underlying causes. It offers worship and bible resources to help Christians to reflect on food and poverty in Britain today.

Friday 16 May 2014

Guest Blog: My Walk to the Foodbank

Article by George, a visitor to West Cheshire Foodbank.

My journey to the Foodbank began at the local Citizens Advice Bureau. A kind volunteer behind the desk gave me a number and informed me this would be called out when it was time for my interview. Waiting here for the next hour, one fact of life becomes startlingly clear: we are all only one phone call, an interest rate rise, a divorce, a death or a slip on the pavement away from an abject poverty that will force difficult decisions on us. 

Photograph: Ian Canham/Alamy

In the waiting room I spoke to a man who looked like a local bank manager. He advised me, quite seriously, on the best way to shoplift food ‘professionally’, using silver foil inside a plastic bag which – so he said – “doesn’t set off the shop alarms”. I found it difficult to challenge him when he justified this on the moral premise that shoplifting food when you’re starving can’t be wrong, especially when you consider the countless tons of waste that supermarkets discard and families waste. Next, a man called ‘Jack’ told me how to fiddle the electrics of the meter. This sounded so complicated that only an electrical engineer could manage it.

I marvelled at the level of ingenuity and deceit required by these two men to make ends meet: the same levels of skill I imagine a professional accountant might need to ‘move the decimal point’ in a labyrinthine corporate tax avoidance scheme that robs the taxpayer and the state. The same state in which the government is driving through massive welfare cuts as it attempts to cut the deficit: cuts that inflict most pain on the poor.

How is it that a successful financiers accounting deception can net him a holiday in Bermuda, while someone on Job seekers allowance is lucky to get a loaf of bread? Why are there no consequences for the wealthy at the same time that inhumane sanctions and destitution await the poor?

The volunteer who interviews me at CAB is obviously frustrated by my situation too and bombards me with statistics highlighting the injustice seen daily here, whilst I thankfully accept my red food voucher.

Ten years ago I sacrificed a good job to go on Carer's Allowance and lived at home with my mother in order to keep her out of a care home. Sadly, she passed away 2 years ago. Although I fortunately gained tenancy of her Council house I am now unable to find a good job due to my disabilities (monocular visionarthritisdepression) and have been subsequently burdened by the bedroom tax. Having saved the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds in care bills I feel it is an injustice to be punished with the bedroom tax. It feels like a tax on my poverty.

Taxes should be progressive and not penalise the most vulnerable people in society. In contrast, the bedroom tax is a regressive and unworkable policy. To start with, there are simply not enough one-bedroom flats available to people who wish to relocate. Over half the welfare bill comes from state pensions yet over one million people over 65 in the UK have personal assets over one million pounds. Why have the wealthiest had welfare payments protected while the poorest are made destitute?  

Our society is changing: we can no longer speak of hunger as just a foreign phenomenon experienced in Third World countries. Starvation is not just felt in Asia or Africa. Appeals on TV from families with desperate faces and pleading voices used to seem a faraway problem to me. As I set off to my local Methodist Church with my food voucher in hand my stomach rumbled: I had not eaten for two days and my hunger kept coming in waves.

I was pleased therefore, to hear that the nations most senior clerics were going on a 24hr fast in sympathy. One Catholic Cardinal called the welfare system a “disgrace”. As a Christian this was heartening news. Very rarely do senior ecclesiastical figures comment and protest against government policy but on hunger and welfare, there appeared to be a strong consensus. Christ hated the self-righteousness of the Pharisees who obeyed the law yet didn’t do anything for the sick and starving. I was pleased to see that the leaders of the established church were choosing to follow the model Christ gave rather than the Pharisees and that they had the courage to speak out against government policy.

As I reached the Foodbank, a redbrick Methodist Chapel on the High Street, I considered the justice in being so dependent on the kindness of strangers simply to eat. Foodbanks are degrading but I’m inspired that for all the talk of breakdown and alienation in contemporary society, people are still willing to sacrifice money, time and effort to care with great sensitivity and respect, for people who have literally come in off the street. As an outsider, it was clear there was a great sense of community inside the church.

The right has cynically exploited this selfless community spirit to force through a huge change to the structure of our society. Foodbanks are now doing what the state should be doing and has been doing since the foundation of the welfare state by the Atlee government of 1945. The gradual breakup of the welfare state and NHS is being subsidised by ordinary working people.

Before I came to the Foodbank I went to the library and researched the Trussell Trust, a charity originally founded to tackle child poverty in Bulgaria. The Trussell Trust now has more than 425 foodbanks in its network and saw the numbers of people going hungry grow by 256% in the last year with 913, 138 people visiting Foodbanks in the financial year 2013/14. One of the major problems is zero-hour contracts. No hours from your employer can mean no food for many. In the world’s eighth largest economy, people are starving.

The library is warm and many come here to read the paper before signing on at the jobcentre. Signing on can be a nerve-wracking affair. Since last December 875 000 people have had their benefits stopped, often for the slightest misdemeanour. I spoke to a young woman in her twenties who’d had her benefit stopped for a simple spelling mistake regarding an employment agency she was registered with. “I don’t know what to do! How am I going to feed my kid? I misspelt the name of an employment agency on my jobsearch form.”

Despite the unwritten rule of silence, people talk in whispered tones about their problems with the system. A teenager told me he’d had his benefit stopped for being five minutes late signing on. A middle-aged man was on the verge of a breakdown: he was sanctioned because he didn’t understand computers. Most job applications must now be submitted via email, with attachments and for someone with no experience or support, this can be very complicated. The computer course offered by the Jobcentre doesn't teach you how to send an email with an attachment or show you how to update a CV. It is utterly useless. Ironically, for those who are then sanctioned, there is a section on ‘how to eat well on a budget’.

Accompanying poverty is the unwelcome spectre of mental illness. Once on benefits a lot of people tend to become more isolated within their community and distanced from their family if they are fortunate enough to have one. Once their benefits are stopped, these problems compound tenfold. I know this from personal experience. I was diagnosed with clinical depression.

Walking down the stairs discussing my plight I speak to a man who states he would rather eat dogfood than go to a Foodbank, “I’d never go to a Foodbank. I’m too proud. Last week I bought 3 tins of dog food with my last pound. If you mix it with a bit of tomato puree it’s not too bad.”

Depressed beyond words I aimlessly wander around the bookshelves and pick up George Orwells Road to Wigan Pier. I then browse the absurd Home Office guidelines on what constitutes poverty: only being able to afford a week long foreign holiday and a bottle of wine a week. For me, holidays and wine are reserved for an El Dorada fantasy moment. Genuine poverty is constantly reusing teabags, watching TV in the dark with a coat on, eating food past it’s sell by date, having to walk 4 miles with a hole in your shoe because you can’t afford the bus fare to sign on, buying all your clothes from the charity shops, always watching the electricity meter, eating one low calorie meal a day and never answering the door in case it’s a bailiff.

I’m astonished how ignorant many middle and upper middle class people are of this poverty now endemic in the UK. Most journalists seem to follow a well worn path in articles and programmes where, for example, rich people subtly patronise the poor by spending a week with them. For the cosseted rich it is a voyeuristic exercise. For the poor it seems just shy of  humiliation.

“People are angry!” said a man outside the Foodbank, summoning up the courage to go in. “Why don’t we see any riots in the streets? If we were in Italy or Spain there’d be riots. We are paying the price for other people mistakes”. I didn’t disagree with him.

I’ve always been a law abiding citizen but I’ve entertained the idea of shoplifting in order to feed myself. And I’d received enough information to do it ‘professionally’. Is this morally permissible, if you’re starving through no fault of your own?

I couldn’t help but compare my plight with that of a city banker. The banks acted in a way that was unquestionably idiotic. The financial sector lent other people’s money out for profit without properly assessing the risk. And yet there seem to have been no consequences. Quite the reverse, taxpayers money was used to bail them out and huge bonuses are still paid despite a track record of incompetence.

Would a bookmaker reimburse me if I walked in and placed a bet on a losing horse using someone else’s money? The banks have been bailed out to the tune of £133bn and if they can steal off the taxpayer, why can't I steal an orange from the market? I’d just be reclaiming what has already been taken from me.

I receive my two bags of food and a cup of tea from a nice lady in the Foodbank. I’m grateful for the basic items which include a packet of pasta, tinned sausages, powdered milk and a Fray Bentos pie. It’s enough food to last me three days. Enough to postpone my career in crime! It could be a slippery slope after all; if I start off pinching oranges, I could end up robbing a bank!

Academics have shown that capitalism is prone to crisis. Perhaps next time it will affect the wealthiest and the entire greed infused edifice of capitalism will come crumbling down like a series of dominoes as skyscraper smashes into skyscraper.

If so, you’ll find me sat on a park bench with my stolen orange offering some to anyone who walks by, including the ‘undeserving’ rich. Because ‘greed is not good’. 

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of West Cheshire Foodbank or its employees. 

Wednesday 14 May 2014

Foodbank National Conference 2014 #FBN2014 @Trussell Trust

West Cheshire Foodbank was at the Trussell Trust Foodbank Conference today! It was really exciting to share what's been going on across the Foodbank network over the last year.


It was great to be able to contribute to the seminar on client stories too. If you were attending and you'd like to get in touch about what we do you can email us info@westcheshire.foodbank.org including FAO Alec Spencer in the subject line.


Monday 12 May 2014

Road to Warehouse from M53 Junction 10 Closed: Use Junction 9

We've just had a notification that the canal bridge on Stanney Mill Road will be closed from 15 to 22 May for more roadworks to be carried out.

If you are coming to the warehouse during this time, please use Junction 9 of the M53 (Town Centre/Boat Museum) and follow the diversion signs.


Sorry for the inconvenience.

Saturday 10 May 2014

Guest Blog: Poor diet is the result of poverty not lack of education

By Lynne Kennedy, University of Chester


Cheaper than the real thing, but less healthy. David WrightCC BY-NC-ND

Public health professionals are calling on the prime minister to do more to help the many families in the UK who cannot afford a decent diet.

Contrary to popular belief, people who are experiencing food poverty are not ignorant of what they should eat as part of a healthy diet or even where to buy affordable food. There is a wealth of research showing that the most important factor for having a healthy diet is access to affordable healthy food.

Money for food is the key flexible item in the budget of low income households. This means that the quantity and quality of food purchased and consumed by families is the first to suffer at times of financial hardship such as an unexpected bill or cut in work.

It is well documented that family members, particularly women, will go without food to ensure their children have enough. So food poverty is a gender inequality issue too.

Families on a low income are not able to afford enough fresh food, such as fruit and vegetables, which are required as part of a healthy diet. Families with limited incomes are more concerned about hunger and are likely to choose food that is filling over what is high in nutrients. Historical studies of household food purchasing patterns suggest that parents with restricted food budgets would choose food with higher satiety value such as a packet of biscuits at less than 50p, compared to a bag of apples at around £1, as a snack for their children.

In the long term this kind of decision may contribute to higher risk of malnutrition among socially deprived households. Plus, families that don’t eat much fresh food are also disadvantaged because they miss out on the protective benefits of a diet high in fresh fruit and vegetables against cardiovascular disease and certain cancers.

In the past decade, the strategy for promoting dietary change in the UK has largely focused on providing nutrition education. The emphasis was clearly placed on individual responsibility, relying on disseminating healthy eating advice as the main vehicle for change. Although dietary trends suggest improvements have been made, this is far from universal, with increasing health and nutritional inequalities between socio-economic groups.

Tackling food poverty requires more than just education. Initiatives that focus on nutrition education, or even on practical food skills, only paper over the cracks of the real issue, which is affordable food and a living wage. These small scale initiatives do not reach sufficient numbers of people and are therefore limited as part of the overall solution.

Research consistently demonstrates that low income households find it difficult to adopt healthy eating guidelines. Evidence shows that eating healthily is more expensive. Poor access to shops and inadequate storage and cooking facilities are also a factor for those on a low income – not lack of nutrition knowledge.

The ability to prepare food from raw ingredients – rather than relying on highly processed ready meals, which have less nutritional value than the fresh alternatives – however, does appear to be an important skill that many families have lost over the years. So many families are reliant upon buying processed foods and ready meals, which are not only typically higher in salt, sugar and fat content than fresh alternatives, but also more expensive to buy.

Successive governments in the UK have chosen to ignore the important role of structural factors. This includes access to shopping facilities within neighbourhoods, regulation of the nutritional quality of food in the cheaper ranges of products sold by major retailers and the lack of a food element within welfare benefits.

The rise of food banks reflects the failure in the current welfare system for those families or individuals whose wages haven’t risen along with food prices. They should only be used in emergency situations and certainly not relied upon. Some people have criticised the nutritional value of foods served at food banks and the lack of fresh products, but they are only meant to provide calorific intake to stave off hunger in emergency situations. Indeed, families are restricted in the number of times they can access the services.

Let’s hope the government pays heed to this need to address the structural causes of food poverty. Otherwise the UK may end up on a similar path to the US where food poverty is far more widespread.

The Conversation
Lynne Kennedy receives funding from NHS Public Health Wales, EU funding,

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Friday 9 May 2014

Guest Blog: A living wage – not food aid – is answer to issue of food poverty

By Elizabeth Dowler, University of Warwick

Charitable food provision is growing, and more and more people are being fed by food banks and other initiatives. The press and TV have debated the legitimacy of such provision and highlighted the number of users. Clearly many people contribute food, time and other resources to sustain these worthy deeds.

But why are people going to food banks in the UK? And is charitable food the answer to what many describe as food poverty?

Charity and local action is certainly welcome, but by itself it is not enough. A group of 170 leading public health professionals, including me, has written an open letter to the Prime Minister, calling for further action as people are increasingly trapped between falling or stagnant wages and rising food prices.

Many others have recognised this problem. Just before Easter a group of leading Christian clergy and other faith leaders wrote to the main party leaders to challenge the moral position of a rich country with rising numbers unable to feed themselves adequately. At the same time, an All Party Parliamentary Group initiated an Inquiry into Food Poverty, chaired by the Bishop of Truro; its terms of reference go beyond “food banks”, and a call for written evidence will be supplemented by hearings in at least five parts of the country. This builds on growing concern among government agencies and NGOs such as Church Action on Poverty and Oxfam.

The story isn’t new, however: food poverty has existed in the UK for a long time – often hidden, but contributing to inequalities in health and wellbeing. And the bishops have form as well: in February they challenged the government to listen to people’s stories of struggling to manage in austerity, and to church experiences of trying to help.

At the same time, and after a long delay, Defra published research by myself, two other academics and the Food Ethics Council, on the use of food aid in the UK. We found the main reasons why people are increasingly asking for food help are “crises” in household income from loss of jobs or problems with social security benefits, often underpinned by on-going problems of low income, rising food and other costs, and increasing indebtedness. For many households, asking for food assistance is a strategy of last resort, and many more who need help do not ask for it.
Our research also showed that informal food aid can meet short-term needs, so long as the provision is sufficient, healthy and meets cultural needs. But it does not address the underlying causes of household food insecurity and thus does not solve the major problems – however well intentioned and organised.

In the storm of media commentary following these publications, I was surprised by how many seemed surprised at the findings: we have had economic austerity measures in the UK for at least four years, and the effects of cuts in jobs, wages and welfare are well documented.

Less widely understood perhaps are the current challenges to the global food system which, among other things, have led to higher food prices; Defra’s own data show that since 2000, average incomes of low-income households have risen by 22%, but food prices have gone up 33%. People on low incomes are caught in a pincer movement of impoverishment and malnourishment, but no-one seems to have responsibility to ensure people have enough money for daily food.

Our 2010 research for Defra showed that many even then were finding it much harder to afford the food they wanted, and that food costs were a serious source of stress. This was before any austerity measures, including all the changes to social security benefits; inevitably, things will be worse now.

Policy responses have tended to blame individual failings – “people do not know how to budget, shop and cook” – and to laud local-level food initiatives and charitable redistribution efforts to help people in increasing need. (Indeed, many local councils are diverting the emergency loan money to local food banks.)

These do a great job and the generosity of the workers and volunteers is not in doubt. But, as many who work in the voluntary sector know well, the efforts involved are too small and too piecemeal to meet systematic need – they can only manage stop-gap, emergency help – and the work is very hard to sustain, particularly for volunteers. It is no substitute for an accountable system of social security.

Indeed, abdicating responsibility to voluntary, local level responses, however careful and well meaning, contributes to depoliticising the problem and fails to tackle society-wide causes. It also puts blame on those who least deserve it. A look at the evidence from Europe and North America reveals that while local level solutions have their place, including potential for advocacy, they cannot address the real reasons many people go hungry.

For that we need more reliable indicators so that problems can be monitored systematically. We must acknowledge just how serious this is – that there are people who cannot afford to provide themselves and their families with a healthy diet. At the very least we need widespread adoption of the living wage and proper work contracts, so that people can have sustainable livelihoods, rather than charity.

We can all eat fairly and well in this rich country, but we need creative imagination and expression of communal values to do so. To perpetuate an inappropriate response is surely a collective moral failing.

The Conversation
Elizabeth Dowler has received funding via the University of Warwick from the Food Standards Agency, ESRC and Defra. She is an honorary member/trustee of the Food Ethics Council, a registered charity. She is a Public Health Nutritionist registered with the Association of Nutrition.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article

Tuesday 6 May 2014

Let's Keep Volunteering Voluntary @keepvolvol



West Cheshire Foodbank is supporting the Keep Volunteering Voluntary Campaign. 


We are proud of every person who volunteers with us and we know the value of volunteering. Volunteering means people independently choosing to give their time freely to help others and make the world a better place. Workfare schemes force unemployed people to carry out unpaid work or face benefit sanctions that can cause hardship and destitution.   We believe in keeping volunteering voluntary and will not participate in government workfare schemes.



Friday 2 May 2014

Rebecca's Story

"We have just had a new baby - Rebecca is nearly 6 weeks old. 

Daddy was made redundant and is receiving JSA. Mum is awaiting maternity allowance but because of a delay in the tax office we will not be receiving a payment for as long as 8 weeks. Because of this we are experiencing significant hardship. We didn't expect for the process to take this long and we have exhausted all the financial options available. We are very grateful for the foodbank. Thank you."

Thank you so much to this family. We're really grateful you felt able to share this with us.